The idea of a double standard between the sexes has sparked a lot
of debate in the post-modern era. Feminists insists that it is a form
of oppression on women by subjugating them to activities like
household chores and other traditional female roles. They see their
side of the standard as a form of objectification which debases the
female. The whole system is seen as only benefiting all men, at the
cost of all women being subjugated in life. This idea is facile as it
fails to regard how the gender roles emerged from environmental and
anatomical conditions from our past.
The truth is one role is not more significant then the other.
Rather, both are necessary but make up different parts which
accompany each other in very complementary ways. Males are forced to
defend the home and provide resources for it- a very dangerous job.
Females are supposed to care for and maintain the home- a very
difficult job. Although the modern age has liberated us from these
roles, we still carry the psychological and anatomical baggage of our
past- which shapes our behavior and minds. Our inherited cultural
customs also reflect our past conditions. Therefore, its not
surprising that many social institutions like marriage are crumbling
in the wake of our self-sufficiency and individualistic economic
system. In the absence of direct genetic intervention, it is unlikely
that humans will drop their inherited gender differences. Yet it is
possible with conscious intervention to work on these behaviors and
acknowledge them for what they are: ways of adapting to the
environment, and not a general form of female slavery. This way,
people can make rational decisions on how to alter their behavior
depending on their surroundings, not subscribing to a false dichotomy
of either being an agent of oppression or a victim of tradition.
What gives us a double standard is our history in relation with
the environment. Men were resource providers, while women were
resource stewards. Each role is necessary for survival. Any perceived
imbalance in value stems, not from the roles themselves, but the
upstarts who seek control over other people through either violence
or coercion. It is they who inflate one role over the other (their
role) as a way to justify their power. They announce that it is
because the role they assume is superior that they have the right to
oppress others. Although most tyrants in history have been male, it
does not means most males were the oppressor. Rather, most men
throughout history have been the ones oppressed along with women. The
fact of the matter was, if one was not apart of a powerful family or
clan, then one was very likely to be oppressed by one. Cases of males
with lesser status or class maltreating any woman was not due to the
role itself bringing out this kind of behavior. Instead, those males
have taken the twisted view of the inflated role from the very
tyrants oppressing them. As there only view of power does not come
from cooperation or compassion but oppression, they have no other
ways to think of their role. This confines males to a inflated view
of their role because of their ignorance about other views. Its plain
to see how what makes the double standard in gender roles become
oppressive is not anything inherent in it, but the tyrannical forces
which shape the social view of these roles- making the male inflated
over the female.
The modern age has given us the tools necessary to transcend
previous boundaries and restraints. Nevertheless, we carry around
bodies which were designed for the past which represent over 95%-99%
of human history- the era of foraging. This era required each gender
to perform a certain and critical role because their biology was
optimized for it. Only with the advent of tyrants and social
structures like divine kingship and royalty came the oppressive
qualities which would be juxtaposed on top of the already existing
roles, thus rendering one to become inflated over the other. The
inflation acts as a cast to indoctrinate minds with these kinds of
values. It is only by acknowledging this double standard of gender
roles as a way to adapt to the environment and not as an intrinsic
tool of oppression, that we can improve the schism between the sexes.
I like your blog. It's really a thinker. :)
ReplyDelete